[ad_1]
Supreme Court Of India
Bela M.trivedi,
Dipankar Datta
, JJ
Constitution of India , Art.133— Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) , S.114— Vexatious applications – Fate of – After a period of more than three years, respondents had preferred application seeking review of a judgment passed in second appeal without getting any specific permission from the Supreme Court – Said application was dismissed for want of prosecution – Respondents kept on filing miscellaneous civil applications and same were dismissed for want of prosecution – No litigant should be permitted to be so lethargic and apathetic, much less should be permitted to misuse the process of law – Order of High Court allowing vexatious miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of earlier miscellaneous application, that too without assigning any reason, was erroneous.
Misc. Civil Application (for recall) No. 3 of 2019 in Regular Second Appeal No. 84 of 1997, Dt. 27.09.2022 (Guj)-Reversed
(Para 8)
Step 1
Enter your contact details.
[ad_2]